n February, American Anbasador spoke at a Rotary Club event where she commented about the call by some political parties to bring back military rule. ” Several newspapers and news channels misquoted her and claimed she had said: “The US administration will not allow the Egyptian army to return to power.” ?
The US ambassador’s predictions about the difficulties of democratic transition were correct, but she could never imagine that she herself would become a target for many in both Islamic and non-Islamic political forces. Islamists who fear the overthrow of President Mohamed Morsi attack her and choose to blame Washington, while liberals attack Patterson instead of admitting their own political and electoral weaknesses and failures.
Then american Ambassador talked about her priorities in her new post, most notably supporting democratic transition. She believed the majority of Egyptians will for the first time in their life witness free elections. Patterson added that during the transitional phase in Egypt, the US will hear many voices that do not serve its interests and the democratic process in Egypt will be very difficult because of the novelty and fragility of Egypt’s institutions of democracy.
Many accused her of aiming to tame Islamist forces and spread mayhem in Egypt. There were many rumours in the Egyptian media, and which were not retracted, even when they were revealed as fabrications.
In a speech at Ibn Khaldun Centre last week, Ambassador Patterson said: “Egypt needs stability to get its economic house in order, I recommend Egyptians get organised. Join or start a political party that reflects your values and aspirations. Egyptians need to know a better path forward. This will take time. You will have to roll up your sleeves and work hard. Progress will be slow and you often will feel frustrated. But there is no other wn general, an ambassador’s job includes representing their country, presenting its view on critical issues in the host country, as well as participating in decision making back home by giving their opinion, sending reports and making suggestions.
Since her arrival in Cairo, Ambassador Patterson’s perspective evolved based on four fundamental facts:
First, the victory of Muslim Brotherhood and Islamist candidates in all elections and referendums in Egypt — such as the People's Assembly, the Shura Council, the presidential race, the referendum on the constitution — is evidence of their strong influence. Second, the Muslim Brotherhood is prepared to rule and manage the affairs of the state of Egypt. Third, the non-Islamist opposition is divided and lacks a consensus leadership and is disconnected from the street and Egyptian citizenry. Fourth, the people of Egypt are exhausted with the transitional phase and want stability.
Accordingly, Patterson and the US concluded that the political Islamist current will rule Egypt and Washington must rely on the Muslim Brotherhood in key regional issues. This was the case during the Gaza crisis and currently in the Syrian crisis, while Egypt’s domestic issues fall second place.
Meanwhile, the new Egyptian leadership adopted the same liberal economic policies as had Mubarak’s regime and even expanded agreements, which reassured the US.
The post of ambassador to Cairo is one of the most crucial in the US State Department, but it has its negative aspects, such as the amplification of the role and the lure of its importance, especially since Patterson deals with Egyptian groups from across the spectrum that are prone to exaggerating the scope, weight and influence of the US role.
Yes, the US ambassador was over zealous in connecting with the political Islamist current, which is very obvious in her unnecessary meetings with key Muslim Brotherhood figures, the group’s Supreme Guide Mohamed Badie and his deputy Khairat Al-Shater. This raises questions about the significance and role of the US in Egypt’s current political dynamics.
No comments:
Post a Comment